I don’t really care if the Church is culturally relevant. Of course I don’t want us to wallow in some old-time, glory days that probably never existed. But cultural relevance is not the answer.
It’s better to be relevant than stale, but being relevant isn’t enough. We need the Church to be better than relevant. The Church needs to lead.
Chasing cultural relevance reminds me of an episode from the old TV sitcom Third Rock from the Sun, in which the aliens tried to blend in with earth culture by doing what was popular. They watched only the highest-rated TV shows, wore the best-selling clothes, ate at the biggest chain restaurants, etc. They didn’t do what they enjoyed, only what was popular. As a result, they became bland and bored.
By the end of the episode they decided that being themselves was better than blending in.
Trying to be culturally relevant is turning the Church into followers instead of leaders.
A relevant Church may be following slightly ahead of others, but we’re still following. Too often that makes our Churches look too much the same in ways we ought to be different – from each other and from the culture.
Chasing cultural relevance can give us a false sense of success because it can be learned by reading the right books and watching a couple of the latest TV shows. But thinking I can reach the youth of my community because I read a book on postmodernism and wear the latest clothes is a delusion.
So if not cultural relevance, then what?
We need to stop worrying about being culturally relevant and start being contextually real. Contextually real. That’s our goal!
Ministry is not about relevance, it’s about reality. It’s not about the culture, it’s about our context. It’s about living my real life in the context of other people’s real lives.
How have we missed this simple truth? Why would we want to replace it with being culturally relevant?
Here are a few possible reasons:
• Cultural relevance is cool. Contextual reality isn’t.
• Cultural relevance is broad. Contextual reality is narrow.
• Cultural relevance is generic. Contextual reality is personal.
• Cultural relevance follows trends. Contextual reality listens to people.
• Cultural relevance creates insiders and outsiders. Contextual reality invites outsiders in.
• Cultural relevance celebrates success. Contextual reality recognizes our hurts.
• Cultural relevance can happen at a distance. Contextual reality means getting our hands dirty.
Cultural relevance is more comfortable for a lot of us. It helps us feel like we’re in charge of something. Contextual reality, on the other hand, is anything but comfortable. It puts us in charge of nothing. And it often raises more questions than it answers.
Contextual reality has one huge advantage: IT IS REAL
Jesus was contextually real. Jesus didn’t care about being relevant to His culture. Not to the Jewish culture He lived in, to the Roman culture that was subjugating them, or to the Greek culture that framed their thinking.
Jesus was real and He adapted to the reality of whatever context He found himself in. One city at a time, one crowd at a time, one person at a time. And he did it without ever betraying His core reality.
So maybe instead of asking “what’s cool?”, “what’s relevant?” or even “what’s new?” our Churches ought to be asking people “what reality are you living in?” and “what better reality does Jesus have for you?”
Dealing with people rather than trends takes a little longer. But it’s well worth it and it’s only way we can really earn people’s trust so that they’ll allow us to share the deeper reality that’s only found in Jesus. A reality that fits any context and any culture.